The Romans only showed appreciation for technologies that could hold some benefit for the upper-class.
The Roman documents portrayed the Romans weak reliance on technology, however they do emphasize a beauty to the aesthetic side of technology. Related documents. These include a serving attitude where the leader sees his primary responsibility to those whom he leads as to serve and develop them to fulfill their God-given mandate.
On the other hand, the Romans marveled at their civilizations technological advancements, yet scorned those who made a living working with tools and crafts.
How to cite this page Choose cite format:.
What are their major differences? These two dynasties were different when it came their borders, as well as government. In order to thoroughly understand the Roman attitudes toward technology being essential it would be resourceful to have an additional document with the opinion of a lower classmen from Rome addressing the same issues that Cicerco and Seneca explained.
Topics The worldwide transition to globalization Globalization if the process of integration and interconnectedness among economies.
So, Romans had a clear aesthetic attitude towards their technology and believed how both the function and the form were important factors. Han China B. The Roman Empire, which lasted from B. Dir Comp 1 pt.
Unacceptable thesis — merely restates the question and is too vague 18 What do you think of the following thesis statements?